Location: Open Access Wiki

Discussion: OA Wiki NC - the wrong decisionReported This is a featured thread

Category: Discussion Forum / General Discussion
Showing 4 posts

Klausgraf
OA Wiki NC - the wrong decision
Apr 15 2007, 2:41 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 15 2007, 2:41 PM EDT
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/3588140/ 1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    
Keyword tags: None

kclavel
1. RE: OA Wiki NC - the wrong decision
Apr 19 2007, 6:28 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 19 2007, 6:28 AM EDT
Can you explain your point of view in more detail? You say there are strong arguments that commercial use is in the intention of OA declarations. What are these arguments? 0  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

Klausgraf
2. RE: OA Wiki NC - the wrong decision
Apr 20 2007, 10:47 PM EDT | Post edited: Apr 20 2007, 10:47 PM EDT
"Can you explain your point of view in more detail? You say there are
strong arguments that commercial use is in the intention of OA
declarations. What are these arguments?"
Sorry, I have given a link with the arguments:
http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/3493112/

Why it is it necessary to repeat these arguments?

Please note that you cannot allow users to modify contents of the Wiki because a wetpoint.com-Wiki is commercial use. This is a contradictio in adiecto.

1  out of 1 found this valuable. Do you?    

kclavel
3. RE: OA Wiki NC - the wrong decision
Apr 24 2007, 4:40 AM EDT | Post edited: Apr 24 2007, 4:40 AM EDT
In http://archiv.twoday.net/stories/3493112/ you only provide examples of publishers who don't use NC but no arguments, that's why I asked. However, I read Erik Moeller's article and that made things a bit more clear. Thanks for your input. Do you find this valuable?